New Jersey sues to block congestion pricing toll in New York City


New Jersey sued the federal government to block a plan to charge drivers entering midtown Manhattan, claiming the green light the US gave New York’s congestion pricing proposal was ill-considered and missed numerous risks to Garden State residents.

The challenge came Friday morning in a federal lawsuit the state filed against the US Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, or FHWA. 

Drivers may have to pay the charge starting as soon as the first quarter of next year, with E-ZPass motorists who enter the city south of 60th Street paying as much as $23. The tolling program got final approval last month from FHWA, which determined there would be no significant impact, after an environmental review.

New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority says its planned congestion pricing toll for Manhattan will raise money for capital projects and reduce traffic.

Bloomberg News

New Jersey alleges that FHWA’s determination is a “misguided decision” that violates federal guidelines. It argues that FHWA ignored the fact that the new tolls would change commuting patterns, redirecting traffic that would unfairly burden New Jersey crossings not included in the pricing plan.

The National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, requires US agencies to consider the environmental impact of any major federal project — which includes a city plan that uses federal funds — and conduct an assessment that includes public comment.

Impact on New Jersey
“Nothing in this bedrock federal environmental law allows the FHWA to turn a blind eye to the significant environmental impacts that congestion pricing in the Manhattan Central Business District will have on New Jersey, favoring New York at the expense of its neighbors,” the state said in its complaint, filed in federal court in Newark.

About 1.5 million people work in Manhattan’s central business district, and 143,000 of them drive into the area, according to the MTA. That doesn’t include those driving in for reasons other than work.

The new tolls are expected to help raise $15 billion for public transportation projects. New York officials say the charges could also reduce daily traffic in Manhattan’s central business district by 20%. The plan’s supporters say it is necessary to ease congestion in the district, reduce pollution and boost transit ridership, which has yet to return to pre-pandemic levels. London, Stockholm and Singapore, among others, have used similar fees.

But commuters and politicians in New Jersey, as well as drivers who enter Manhattan from the outer boroughs including Brooklyn and Queens, have long opposed the idea.

‘Hard Look’
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy — whose New Jersey Turnpike charges motorists more than $20 to traverse the state — says New Jersey commuters will be unfairly burdened. The state is seeking to block the initial environmental assessment, a shorter process, and force DOT and FHWA to require New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority to conduct a “full and proper” environmental impact statement, which is more thorough.

The state is also asking the court to declare that the failure to prepare a full environmental impact statement for the project violates the National Environmental Policy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, and to set aside the findings and final environmental assessment until a proper analysis is completed in New Jersey.

New Jersey said in the suit that NEPA requires federal agencies to take a “hard look” at the environmental impact of proposed actions.

“Yet that did not occur here, even given the stakes of a proposed action that sought to divert hundreds of thousands of vehicles that would otherwise drive in affluent parts of Manhattan towards other neighborhoods in New York City and New Jersey, including disadvantaged and already overburdened communities,” the state said in its complaint.

Nancy Singer, a spokesperson for the US Department of Transportation, said in an email that the agency doesn’t comment on pending litigation. Tim Minton, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which is implementing the congestion pricing plan, didn’t have an immediate comment on the suit. New York Governor Kathy Hochul didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Air Quality
New Jersey alleges in the suit that the environmental assessment failed to consider the impact on air quality in New Jersey, including the potential increase in PM2.5 levels in Fort Lee, near the George Washington Bridge, that could exceed the latest Environmental Protection Agency standards, the lawsuit said. Such PM readings refer to fine particulate matter, which can pose health risks. 

The final environmental assessment “buried the reality that while Manhattan’s air quality may improve, New Jersey’s air quality will deteriorate as traffic and pollutants shift,” the state claims. New Jersey said the impact on air quality in Bergen County will result in a slew of health issues for residents, including premature mortality, asthma attacks, bronchitis and emergency room visits.

Murphy has said he is open to the idea of congestion pricing but that the goal of the current project is simply to raise revenue for New York’s MTA and its $51.5 billion multi-year capital plan, which will extend the Second Avenue subway to Harlem, modernize signals and finance electric buses.

Those infrastructure projects could be delayed if Murphy’s legal challenge forces the MTA to postpone the plan. The MTA expects the tolls to bring in $1 billion annually, with a plan to raise $15 billion by issuing bonds.

Opponents of such projects often use such impact assessments to challenge plans in federal court. Groups opposing a 1970s-era plan for Westway — a highway with commercial space and parkland that was proposed for 200 acres of landfill on the Hudson River — defeated the project when an appeals court found that a review had failed to take into account its potential effect on the striped bass population.

In April 2008 Jon Corzine, then New Jersey’s governor, threatened a lawsuit to block then New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s proposal to charge motorists entering the busiest parts of Manhattan, saying it would unfairly tax commuters in his state. The New York State Assembly scuttled the plan later that month, deciding not to vote on the proposal. The former mayor is the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent Bloomberg LP. 

A six-member Traffic Mobility Review Board will determine the tolling structure of the new plan and any exemptions, including New Jersey commuters who already pay fees on bridges and tunnels to enter Manhattan. 

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Hunt plans Isa overhaul to boost share ownership
Will Bitcoin price hold $26K ahead of monthly $3B BTC options expiry?
Busan is developing an Ethereum-compatible mainnet to become a ‘blockchain city’
The ‘Great IPO Reopening’ may be on hold: rising rates and weaker stocks are a killer
Munis are weaker ahead of larger new-issue calendar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *